MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029618432

La formación sociológica en la Facultad de Derecho y su rol en las reformas sociales del Uruguay de comienzos del siglo XX

2024· article· es· W7029618432 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSociology and Education in Brazil
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyBourgeoisieLatin AmericansInterpretation (philosophy)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La historiografía latinoamericana sobre el proceso de institucionalización de la sociología ubica hacia los años cincuenta del pasado siglo el momento donde tiene lugar el comienzo de la profesionalización de la disciplina. Desde una perspectiva distinta, el artículo se propone discutir la escasa trascendencia que los estudios habitualmente adjudican a una reflexión teórica que décadas antes ya poseía una notable capacidad de influir en la elaboración de políticas públicas. En esta dirección, se destaca la incidencia que tuvieron los pioneros del pensamiento sociológico en la formación de la clase dirigente que se formaba en las aulas de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales en los inicios de siglo. Autores como A. Comte, H. Spencer, L. Bourgeois y el español Alfredo Posada, hacían parte del debate intelectual de la época y con frecuencia eran utilizados en la elaboración de las tesis requeridas para obtener el título de Doctor en Jurisprudencia y en la redacción de una legislación de avanzada social que caracterizaría al Uruguay durante gran parte del siglo XX. The Latin American historiography on the process of institutionalization of sociology, locates towards the fifties of the last century the moment where the beginning of the professionalization of the discipline takes place. From a different perspective, the article intends to discuss the scant importance that studies usually assign to a theoretical reflection that decades before already had a notable capacity to influence the development of public policies. In this direction, the incidence that the pioneers of sociological thought had in the formation of the ruling class that was formed in the classrooms of the Faculty of Law and Social Sciences at the beginning of the century is highlighted. Authors such as A. Comte, H. Spencer, L. Bourgeois and the Spanish Alfredo Posada, were part of the intellectual debate of the time and were frequently used in the preparation of the theses required to obtain the title of Doctor of Jurisprudence and in the drafting of a socially advanced legislation that would characterize Uruguay for much of the 20th century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSame topicSociology and Education in BrazilFrench-language works237,207