La pantalla dividida, composición y descomposición visual. Film y espacio, Montreal, 1967 (The Divided Screen, Composition and Visual Decomposition. Film and Space, Montreal, 1967)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Exposición Universal de Montreal de 1967 representa uno de los entornos experimentales más importante del siglo en cuanto a los medios de comunicación, distinguiéndose respecto a los anteriores por su particular uso de las tecnologías audiovisuales, la reivindicación de las pantallas y las nuevas tipologías teatrales desarrolladas para dar cabida a nuevas formas de proyección. El presente artículo explora algunas de las propuestas desarrolladas en Montreal, donde espacio y tecnología trabajan de manera conjunta en pos de una experiencia total. The 1967 Montreal Universal Exhibition represents one of the most important experimental environment of the century to media, distinguishing itself from the earlier ones due to its particular use of screens and audiovisual technologies, as well as the new theatrical typologies developed to fit with the new ways of projection. This article explores some of the proposals developed in Montreal, where space and technology worked together looking for a total experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".