La Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño en la Argentina: Trayectorias, experiencias y activismo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este libro propone recuperar las trayectorias de las y los activistas y militantes argentinos que fueron pioneros en los debates que posibilitaron la elaboración de la Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño y también los primeros pasos para su implementación a nivel local. Se compone de doce relatos elaborados a partir de la realización de entrevistas en profundidad enfocadas en las trayectorias y experiencias de quienes, hacia fines de la década de 1980 y principios de 1990, tuvieron una importante y destacada labor en el campo de los derechos humanos, y moldearon así específicas formas de interpretar los derechos de los niños, niñas y adolescentes. Se trata de Estela de Carlotto, Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, Norberto Liwski, Alicia Pierini, Sara Cánepa, Eduardo Bustelo, Emilio García Méndez, Lucila Larrandart, Marisa Graham, Irene Konterllnik, Nelly Minyersky y Laura Taffetani.Como integrante del equipo que elaboró el libro, fui entrevistadora y editora de los capítulos de Norberto Liwski y Emilio García Méndez.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".