MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029661999

Le Staphylococcus aureus méthicillinorésistant dâorigine non nosocomiale dans les communautés autochtones du Canada

2012· article· fr· W7029661999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Institutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaphylococcal Skin InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusNursing homesCross infection
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les infections à Staphylococcus aureus méthicillinorésistant d’origine non nosocomiale (SARM-ONN) sont devenues un grave problème dans certaines communautés autochtones du Canada (y compris les Premières nations, les Inuits et les Métis). Surtout associé à des infections de la peau et des tissus mous, cet organisme peut également entraîner une morbidité et une mortalité importantes. Il existe des lignes directrices canadiennes et américaines publiées sur la prise en charge des infections à SARM-ONN. Il faut examiner les modes précis d’épidémiologie, de microbiologie et de susceptibilité et la situation sociale et environnementale des infections à SARM-ONN dans les communautés autochtones pour parvenir à des stratégies qui en réduiront la transmission. La réduction des maisons surpeuplées et l’amélioration de l’approvisionnement en eau potable au domicile sont des stratégies optimales pour réduire les conséquences de ces infections, mais il est recommandé de mettre en œuvre les lignes directrices canadiennes et d’accroître les stratégies de prévention à titre de mesures provisoires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Same topicEconomic Theory and InstitutionsFrench-language works237,207