La Medicina Natural y Tradicional en los residentes de Pediatría
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Herbal and folk Medicine is a medical specialty that uses methods of health promotion, disease prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation. Its adequate knowledge by Pediatric residents allows a high degree of professional development and comprehensive patient care.Objective: to characterize the level of knowledge about Herbal and folk Medicine of Pediatrics residents according to modalities and conditions.Methods: an observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out in the teaching-care centers “Juan de la Cruz Martínez Maceira” Hospital and“Antonio María Béguez César” pediatric Hospital in the province of Santiago de Cuba, in the first quarter of 2023. Theoretical methods were used: analysis-synthesis and inductive-deductive; empirical ones: questionnaire; and mathematical-statistical for data analysis.Results: the majority of residents considered they had an average level of preparation regarding Herbal and folk Medicine. Homeopathy, followed by floral therapy, were the most used therapeutic modalities; and the respiratory conditions in which its use is most prescribed to patients.Conclusions: the characterization demonstrated that residents require knowledge and skills to take advantage of the wide range of benefits that this specialty brings them for the promotion, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of pediatric diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it