La conservation des artefacts textiles : essai d'ethnologie appliquée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude s'inscrit dans un contexte scientifique multidisciplinaire englobé par le musée, et justifiée par un intérêt collectif de plus en plus marqué pour l'étude de la culture matérielle. Cette étude tend à démontrer l'importance d’une conservation adéquate des collections d'objets de tissu afin de favoriser et de faciliter la recherche nécessitant l'examen de spécimens matériels. À travers le regard interprétatif de l'ethnologie, l'objet, la collection et la conservation sont définis dans un premier temps. Dans un second temps, un processus théorique d'élaboration d'un système d'entreposage pour des collections d'objets de tissu est détaillé, illustré par les exemples des systèmes élaborés au Musée McCord et au Royal Ontario Museum. Dans un troisième et dernier temps, le processus d'élaboration est appliqué aux costumes et aux textiles de la collection Séguin déposée à l'Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".