MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7029717307

Le Canada et ses définitions de 1867 à 2017 : valeurs, pratiques et représentations Defining Canada, 1867-2017: values, practices and representations

2016· other· fr· W7029717307 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2016
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Context (archaeology)Representation (politics)Government (linguistics)Agency (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce colloque entend se placer dans la perspective historique de la longue durée, en interrogeant non seulement ce qui définit le Canada en 2017, mais en le comparant avec ce qui le définissait en 1867 au moment de la Confédération, ainsi qu’en 1967, lors du centenaire. Le colloque propose d’orienter la réflexion autour de trois axes correspondant aux valeurs, aux pratiques et aux représentations par lesquelles le Canada se définit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.010
Science and technology studies0.0150.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)→French-language works237,207→