MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7029735197

L'émergence de la littérature des premières nations au Québec The emergence of the literature of the first nations in Quebec

2018· other· fr· W7029735197 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2018
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Agency (philosophy)Context (archaeology)International relations
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les auteurs amérindiens de langue française ont fait leur place dans le champ littéraire québécois; ils ont même leur salon du livre depuis plusieurs années, Kwahiatonhk!, avec lancements, entrevues, tables rondes ou conférences de chercheurs. Mais la reconnaissance ne s’arrête pas là, elle est aussi académique. En somme, les publics sont au rendez-vous et les institutions d’enseignement se donnent pour mission de transmettre un savoir «décolonisé».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)→Same topicLiterature and Culture Studies→French-language works237,207→