Le vocable de la schizophrénie au prisme de la presse quotidienne nationale française : un effet de mode ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mylène Costes et Sylvie Laval s’intéressent au vocable de la schizophrénie dans la presse quotidienne nationale française. Elles observent ainsi une certaine persistance d’usages métaphoriques marqués par l’association du champ lexical de la schizophrénie avec le traitement des questions d’actualité. Les auteures notent tout d’abord des éléments récurrents dans le traitement médiatique de la santé mentale et de la schizophrénie. Les registres convoqués sont ceux de la dangerosité du malade, de son infantilité, voire de son irresponsabilité. Elles analysent ensuite les actions mises en œuvre par les instances publiques, les aidants et le corps journalistique. En effet, la prise en charge de la santé mentale est bien une question d’ordre public (recommandations émises en 2016, communication à destination du grand public, etc.). Mais malgré les dispositifs de dé-¬‐stigmatisation, les auteures notent une persistance de la prédominance d’un usage métaphorique dans les messages publics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".