MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029768764

La lengua literaria de Hiponacte

2017· article· es· W7029768764 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterary and Philosophical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Domain (mathematical analysis)History of literature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El objetivo del presente trabajo es el de plantear las características de la lengua literaria de Hiponacte tanto desde la perspectiva de la historia de la lengua, incluida su dimensión social, como desde la de la historia de la literatura. Se examinan los elementos literarios tomados de la épica y de la lírica yámbica, la parodia de la literatura misma, incluida la de carácter más cercano al culto, los procedimientos no literarios y, en fin, los préstamos de otras lenguas. No se olvida para ello el análisis del estilo y la métrica, en la medida en que contribuyen a dar forma a un determinado patrón lingüístico y literario. La conclusión que se presenta desmiente el carácter exclusivamente literario de la creación hiponáctea, pero tampoco abona la lectura de la misma como simple reflejo de una actitud personal y/o de un determinado medio social. Habría de ser entendida como una lengua literaria basada en el dominio de la anfi-bología y el contraste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it