La lengua literaria de Hiponacte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo del presente trabajo es el de plantear las características de la lengua literaria de Hiponacte tanto desde la perspectiva de la historia de la lengua, incluida su dimensión social, como desde la de la historia de la literatura. Se examinan los elementos literarios tomados de la épica y de la lírica yámbica, la parodia de la literatura misma, incluida la de carácter más cercano al culto, los procedimientos no literarios y, en fin, los préstamos de otras lenguas. No se olvida para ello el análisis del estilo y la métrica, en la medida en que contribuyen a dar forma a un determinado patrón lingüístico y literario. La conclusión que se presenta desmiente el carácter exclusivamente literario de la creación hiponáctea, pero tampoco abona la lectura de la misma como simple reflejo de una actitud personal y/o de un determinado medio social. Habría de ser entendida como una lengua literaria basada en el dominio de la anfi-bología y el contraste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".