MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029793783

Les liaisons dangereuses de Laclos, roman de la transgression

2011· other· en· W7029793783 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepictionReading (process)Plot (graphics)WitchPeriod (music)Space (punctuation)Close readingMarine transgression
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Published at a time when France was undergoing great changes, Laclos' Liaisons dangereuses reflect the revolutionary dynamic in their depiction of the lives of aristocratic libertines. This thesis analyses Les liaisons dangereuses, which critics have called a roman du libertinage et de la séduction, as a novel of transgression. By claiming to take his inspiration from reality, Laclos seems to situate his text outside fiction and thus brings transgression into public life (hence the contemporary controverse surrounding the publication of this book).This thesis shows how and why the libertines Merteuil and Valmont embody transgression, to which they introduce the inexperienced Cécile de Volanges, Mme de Tourvel and Danceny. Although the novel may be best known for its corrupt protagonists and complex plot, its form is also notable. The epistolary codes of the period are violated as well : indispensable to the plot and to the ensuing transgressions, the letter also is their medium. Finally, we analyse the extent to which Les liaisons dangereuses represent an improper reading for Laclos' contemporaries. Since the text puts readers at the scene along with its devious libertines and thus leads them to transgress as well, through his book, Laclos creates for both his characters and his readership a dangerous space open to several trangressions, most of them of a sexual nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.143
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207