Le mythe de l’ouverture et de la tolérance de l’État canadien envers les personnes LGBTQ+ dans Canada’s Drag Race
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Canada est un pays reconnu à l’international pour son ouverture et sa tolérance envers les personnes LGBTQ+ et en tant que pays d’immigration. La diversité multiculturelle du pays a bien été représentée dans les trois premières saisons de Canada’s Drag Race avec des participantes drag queens provenant notamment, des minorités culturelles, de l’immigration, des membres des peuples autochtones, des réfugiées et des francophones. Néanmoins, malgré cette diversité des participantes , l’émission n’a pas permis l’expression d’une vision contradictoire au nationalisme canadien et a encensé son multiculturalisme et son ouverture précisément aux réfugiés queers, avec peu de moments contraires à ce mythe de la tolérance et de l’ouverture. Ainsi l’émission a reproduit le discours du mythe de la tolérance et de l’ouverture multiculturelle du Canada en décrivant à plusieurs reprises, les pays « étrangers » comme homophobes, et en appliquant un discours normatif sur les personnes de l’immigration comme son système d’immigration. En créant un triptyque mère-drag-patrie-commissaire, l’émission reproduit la logique nationaliste du Canada sans les altérer et renforce le discours du Canada comme terre d’accueil pour les personnes queers. \nMots-clés : nationalisme canadien, homonationalisme, LGBTQ+, queer, réfugiés, immigration, migration queer, drag, drag queen, Ru Paul’s Drag Race, Canada’s Drag Race, télévision au Canada, télévision queer \n \nAbstract \nCanada is recognized around the world for is openness and tolerance toward LGBTQ+ people and as a country open to immigration. Having drag queens from immigrant, refugee, indigenous and French-Canadian background, the first three seasons of Canada’s Drag Race reflected the multicultural diversity of the country. Nonetheless, even with this diversity of drag queens in the race, the program didn’t allow the participants to express a more contentious vision of Canada’s nationalism and praised the multiculturalism of the nation and his acceptance precisely toward queer refugees without contradicting its openness and tolerance myth. Canada’s Drag Race reproduced the openness and tolerance myth of Canada emphasizing the homophobia of foreign countries, strengthening the perception of Canada as a safe haven for queer people and assigning a normative discourse regarding immigrant people like in its immigration apparatus. By creating a triptych drag-mother-land-IRB members, the TV series reproduced the Canadian nationalist logic without impairing it. \n \nKeywords: Canadian nationalism, homonationalism, LGBTQ+, queer, refugees, queer migration, immigrants, drag, drag queen, Ru Paul’s Drag Race, Canada’s Drag Race, Canadian television, queer television
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".