MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7029816805

L’implication des femmes immigrantes originaires de pays de l’Afrique francophones dans le système scolaire franco-manitobain : la perception des mères des élèves nouveaux arrivants dans leur contribution à la scolarité de leurs enfants

2015· dissertation· fr· W7029816805 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Saint-Boniface
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTypologyEthnic discriminationCultural environmentContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce travail de mémoire cherche à comprendre l’implication des femmes immigrantes originaires de pays de l’Afrique francophone nouvellement arrivées dans le milieu scolaire franco-manitobain. Il vise à discerner les domaines de scolarité ainsi que les rôles que les mères jouent dans leur implication. Cette recherche qualitative a été menée au moyen d’entrevues individuelles semi-dirigées qui ont permis de recueillir les réalités de ces mères afin de mieux comprendre leur perception quant à leur contribution à la scolarité de leurs enfants. L’analyse de données recueillies a dégagé des résultats qui corroborent avec les littératures sur le sujet à savoir : l’importance de l’aide aux devoirs, la valorisation de la scolarisation comme véhicule d’amélioration du bien-être social, le besoin qu’ont les mères de communication avec l’école. Les recommandations proposent à l'école de continuer ses efforts de communication et de développer davantage une ouverture envers les parents en les impliquant dans ses activités.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development→French-language works237,207→