MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029818958

Low-Frequency Acoustic Source Detection and Localization

2024· dissertation· en· W7029818958 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsDeep learningContext (archaeology)MicrophoneBeamformingArtificial neural networkAcoustic source localizationMicrophone arraySet (abstract data type)Deep neural networks
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In aviation, clear-air turbulence (CAT) is a major cause of in-flight injuries. It occurs in cloudless skies and cannot be detected by the onboard weather radar. Studies have predicted the extent of CAT to increase substantially in the next few decades, thus \nnecessitating a method for detecting CAT. \n \nWith CAT known to generate low-frequency and infrasonic acoustic emissions, acoustic-based methods can potentially be deployed for detection and localization. This thesis studies low-frequency acoustic source detection and localization in the context of CAT. \n \nLocalizing low-frequency acoustic sources is challenging for acoustic beamforming which suffers from poor resolution at low source frequencies. A deep learning-based method is adopted as an alternative. Deep learning models for two-dimensional and three-dimensional acoustic source localization (ASL) have been built using synthetic data and computationally inexpensive neural network architectures. These models are necessary to prove the viability of deep learning for low-frequency ASL. The thesis then explores the potential of a deep learning-enabled, acoustics-based method for CAT detection in the future through a large-scale, virtual flight case, set up for the detection of a representative CAT source. The flight case tries to predict what an in-flight microphone will detect around a CAT source through a technique known as auralization which simulates the acoustic field of a source by modeling the sound propagation and determining what a receiver would hear. \n \nThe deep learning models yield promising qualitative and quantitative results that prove the feasibility of using deep learning for low-frequency ASL. Combined with the results from auralization, it can be concluded that there exists considerable scope for deep learning-enabled, acoustics-based detection and localization of CAT. The future work involves expanding the current scale of research with deeper network architectures to process real, in-flight acoustic data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicPacific and Southeast Asian StudiesFrench-language works237,207