MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029866034

List of freight earned by the Schooner Simcoe in 1812

2022· other· en· W7029866034 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattleGeorge (robot)State (computer science)Administration (probate law)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The schooner Simcoe was built in England. It was involved in the action on Lake Champlain on September 11, 1814. It disappeared from lists after the battle and was apparently renamed the Cochrane. (p. 122, Warships of the Great Lakes, 1754-1834 by Robert Malcomson) The Battle of Plattsburgh in September 1814, also known as the battle of Lake Champlain, was a British campaign to invade upper New York State by land and water. It was largely unsuccessful. The campaign was planned and overseen by Sir George Prevost, the Governor-in-Chief of Canada. Prevost hoped that by occupying Plattsburgh, Lower Canada would have greater security. He planned to have the British lake fleet under the command of George Downie attack the U.S. naval fleet under Thomas Macdonough at Sacket's Harbour. From there, they would attack Plattsburgh's men. After an aggressive advance by the British troops, Prevost lacked information that would allow the attack to proceed and halted the land invasion. Once he had the necessary intelligence, he once again delayed the attack by waiting for the naval force to join them. He pressed British naval commander Downie to prematurely attack the American naval force. In the resulting attack, Downie was killed and his squadron was lost. Prevost called off the attack and retreated to Lower Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1240.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)French-language works237,207