MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029899999

Le due insulae presso la scalinta di S. Maria in Aracoeli. Analisi archeologica e ricostruzione architettonica

2015· article· en· W7029899999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase (matter)PorchQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)Plank
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the analysis and observation of the structures located at the northern slope of the Capitoline Hill, this article proposes a division in phases of the structures and a new reconstructive hypothesis of the buildings. Life stages can be summarized as follows: Phase 1 (middle late Republican age): construction of a substructure wall of the hill; Phase 2 (Trajan age): construction of two insulae separated by a courtyard, the eastern one rising up to three floors; Phase 3 (Hadrian age): construction of the porch and of the fourth floor of the east insula; Phase 4 (Severan age): construction of a rampant arc in the courtyard; Phase 5 (late IV ‐ early fifth century AD): resurfacing of the court-yard; Phase 6 (second quarter of the V‐end of the X century AD): modifications to the rooms of the eastern insula; Phase 7 (XI‐XVII century AD): construction of the church of San Biagio de’ Mercatello and its rebuilding as SS. Spina della Corona di N.S. Gesù Cristo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)Same topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207