MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029931364

Measurement of the Decay Amplitudes of <i>B</i><sup>0</sup> → <i>J</i>/ψ<i>K</i><sup>*0</sup> and <i>B</i><sub>s</sub><sup>0</sup> → <i>J</i>/ψφ Decays

2000· article· en· W7029931364 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInsecta mundi · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Science CouncilAlfred P. Sloan FoundationFermilabU.S. Department of EnergySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAmplitudeTransverse planeFermilabPolarization (electrochemistry)Particle decay
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An angular analysis of B0 → J/ψK*0and Bs0 → J/ψφ has been used to determine the decay amplitudes with parity-even longitudinal (A0) and transverse (A║) polarization and parity-odd transverse (A┴) polarization. The measurements are based on 190 B0 and 40Bs0candidates obtained from 89 pb-1 of p̅p collisions at the Fermilab Tevatron. The longitudinal decay amplitude dominates with |A0|2= 0.59 ± 0.06 ± 0.01 for B0 and |A0|2 = 0.61 ± 0.14 ± 0.02 for Bs0 decays. The parity-odd amplitude is found to be small with |A┴|2 =0.13-0.09+0.12 ±0.06 for B0 and|A┴|2= 0.23 ± 0.19 ± 0.04 for Bs0 decays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0230.023
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0220.016
Bibliometrics0.0110.018
Science and technology studies0.0140.014
Scholarly communication0.0090.012
Open science0.0240.011
Research integrity0.0110.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsecta mundiSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207