Manoscritti e frammenti miniati di Bibbie atlantiche in biblioteche del Veneto e della Lombardia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The essay examines the illuminations of an Atlantic Bible fragment conserved in Rovigo (Biblioteca dell'Accademia dei Concordi, Frammenti latini I) and of two Atlantic Bibles preserved one in Padova (Biblioteca Capitolare, ms. E 28) and the other in Salò (Br) (Biblioteca dell'Ateneo, ms. D 39). The presentations of the three works aims at clarifying the places and the times of their creation. Documentary evidence for the Padua and Rovigo Atlantic Bibles only date back to the fifteenth century. At that time the first manuscript belonged to the Church of Santa Giustina at Monselice (Pd), while the second was conserved in the Salo Duomo. Both of them were considered as precious treasures, howeve both manuscripts were still used, as can be demonstrated by the marginal notes. Finally, the fragment instead was reused to reinforce the bindings of two printed books belonging to the Library of Jurists in Rovigo. \nThe study of the illuminations, together with paleography and codicology analisis, allows us to considered the Rovigo fragment and the Bible in Padua Chapter Library, as major specimens of the 'early geometrical style'. It is now also possible to confirm that the manuscripts were executed in Umbrian-Rome area, the former, in the third quarter of XI century and the latter at the end of the same century or at the beginning of the following century. The luxurios decoration of the Salò Bible, with over seventy decorated initials, one page with frame and four painted Canons Tables, is presented as an important example of the so called 'middle geometrical' style thanks to comparisons with others well known Atlantic Bible made in Rome in the first quarter of XII century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".