MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029956983

Le WWOOFing, un tourisme rural participatif modifiant le lien entre habitants et touristes

2019· other· fr· W7029956983 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSémaphore (Université du Québec à Rimouski) · 2019
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGerman Social Sciences and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender relationsQualitative analysisRural population
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉ: Le WWOOFing est un échange non monétaire entre un volontaire et un hôte, agriculteur d'une ferme biologique. En contrepartie d'être hébergé et nourri, le volontaire donne environ vingt heures de son temps par semaine, pour aider aux diverses activités de la ferme. Le but de cette recherche est de mieux comprendre le WWOOFing et de l'apprécier comme nouvelle interaction entre touristes et habitants. L'intérêt de cette recherche est dans un premier temps d'analyser le phénomène du WWOOFing au Québec, comme objet sociologique, puis d'essayer de qualifier ses effets sur deux groupes spécifiques : les volontaires (ou wwoofers) et les habitants (non hôtes). À travers un échange « atypique » - c'est-à-dire non marchand - le WWOOFing devient une nouvelle manière d'envisager le tourisme, où le touriste se transforme en volontaire, en participant au développement de fermes biologiques. Les populations visées par cette recherche sont à la fois les volontaires et des habitants en contact avec les fermes où étaient hébergés les volontaires. La forme de cette recherche est appliquée, qualitative et non expérimentale. Ce terrain est une étude de cas, basée sur des entretiens avec habitants et volontaires et des observations participantes dans trois fermes québécoises. Nos résultats de recherche montrent qu'il y a des espaces et fréquences de rencontres spécifiques entre habitants et volontaires : cela engage une relation « authentique », chacun apportant une ouverture à son mode de vie aux personnes de l'autre groupe. L'appréciation et la compréhension des territoires ruraux évolue également tant pour les volontaires que les habitants. A travers le développement du WWOOFing, nous constatons un changement de comportement du touriste : plus à l'écoute des locaux, plus dans l'action concrète, et moins dans des actions de loisirs et de consommation. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en français : WWOOFing, volontariat, échange, don, agriculture biologique, tourisme alternatif, territoires ruraux. -- ABSTRACT: WWOOFing is a non-monetary exchange between a volunteer and a host, such as a farmer of an organic farm. In return for host and feed, volunteers give 20 hours weekly to help indiverse activities of the farm. The goal of this research is to better understand WWOOFing and analyse it as a new interaction between tourists and inhabitants. The interest of this research is firstly to study WWOOFing in Québec as a sociological object, then consider its effects on two specific groups : volunteers (or wwoofers) and residents (or non hosts). Across an « atypical » - non-monetary exchange, WWOOFing is a new way to consider tourism, where tourists become volunteers, participating in the development of organic farms. The target population of this research is both volunteers and residents who are in contact with the farms where they stay as volunteers. This research is applied, qualitative and non experimental, with study cases of 3 Québec farms, as interviews with volunteers and residents and participant observations. Our research results indicate the existence of dedicated spaces, regular meetings and relationships between volunteers and residents. It commits "authentic" relations : each person brings an opening to his way of life to this other group. There is an appreciation and understanding of rural territories progress for both volunteers and residents also. Through the development of WWOOFing, we notice behaviourial changes from tourists : they are more attentive to residents and engage more in concrete actions and less in leisure and consumerism actions. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en anglais : WWOOFing, volunteering, exchange, gift, organic agriculture, alternative tourism, rural territories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSémaphore (Université du Québec à Rimouski)Same topicGerman Social Sciences and HistoryFrench-language works237,207