MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030012609

Measurement of the W boson mass

2009· article· en· W7030012609 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFundação para o Desenvolvimento da UNESPCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueU.S. Department of EnergyVetenskapsrådetConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroKorea Science and Engineering FoundationDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaGrantová Agentura České RepublikyDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)Federal Agency for Science and InnovationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloFermilabNational Science FoundationScience Foundation IrelandSecretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires
KeywordsTevatronFermilabMeasure (data warehouse)DetectorSample (material)Particle decayCollider Detector at Fermilab
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a measurement of the W boson mass in W -> ev decays using 1 fb^-1 of data collected with the D0 detector during Run II of the Fermilab Tevatron collider. With a sample of 499830 W -> ev candidate events, we measure M_W = 80.401 +- 0.043 GeV. This is the most precise measurement from a single experiment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)Same topicHistory of Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207