MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030019606

Maurice Tardif - trajetória de um pesquisador: entre profissionalização do ensino, pensamento crítico e riscos contemporâneos

2021· article· pt· W7030019606 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)Context (archaeology)Identity (music)State (computer science)Ignorance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo Este texto apresenta a trajetória acadêmica do professor, intelectual e pesquisador Maurice Tardif, da Université de Montréal (Universidade de Montreal) no Canadá, por meio da realização de uma entrevista, realizada por Samuel de Souza Neto e Eliana Ayoub em maio de 2017. Maurice Tardif vem dedicando suas reflexões e pesquisas a temáticas educacionais relacionadas aos saberes docentes, à formação profissional, à divisão do trabalho na escola, bem como à inserção profissional e às profissões do ensino no contexto escolar. Ele discute a profissionalização do ensino, questionando o fato desse processo não emergir dos professores, mas de induções do estado ou de movimentos de valorização do magistério, desafiando os professores a lutarem pela sua própria identidade profissional. Além da criação de centros de pesquisa, como o Centre de Recherche Interuniversitaire sur la Formation et la Profession Enseignante (Crifpe – Centro de Pesquisa Interuniversitário sobre a Formação e a Profissão Docente), o que se observa é o nascimento de uma escola de pensamento, a Escola Quebequense sobre a Formação e a Profissão Docente.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicEducation Pedagogy and PracticesFrench-language works237,207