MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030123343

11. Mechanical IJME The Challenges And Risks Of The Arctic Passages On Mohammed Hussein Egypt OPaid

2015· other· en· W7030123343 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPort (circuit theory)ArcticChinaMiddle EastThe arcticSuez canalEast AsiaPeninsula
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a result of global warming and rise in temperature, the Arctic region witnessed melting of ice . The technological development for the extraction of oil and natural gas in the Arctic in addition to political instability and piracy in the Middle East pushed the Nordic countries (Germany , Russia and Canada ) to do research, studies and experiments to take advantage of these resources and to exploit the short distance to transfer trade between Western countries ( Europe, America and Canada ) to the east countries(Japan , China and South Korea ). Two German ships succeeded in September 2009 to sail from a port in South Korea to the Dutch Rotterdam port across the North Sea along the northern Russian border Northern Sea Route 2013, (Information Office), followed by the success of the Russian gas tanker « Baltika» to sail from the Russian city of Murmansk in the August 14, 2010 , to the Chinese city of Shanghai , accompanied by the nuclearicebreaker" 50 years of Victory" across a route inside the territorial waters of the coast of northern Russia from the Arctic Oceanc arrying 70 tons of gas condensate to be a substitute for the southern route through the Suez Canal . Projections indicate that the volume of trade passing across the Northern Sea Route NSR in 2015 to be 4 million tons and may reach to 65 million tons per year in 2020 and to 120 million tons in 2030 (Keil, 2014)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207