Notas biográficas del músico zaragozano Alejo Cuartero y Garza (1859-1935): su etapa oscense
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el presente artículo se aborda la trayectoria artística y profesional de uno de los protagonistas del panorama musical aragonés durante el último cuarto del siglo XIX: el zaragozano Alejo Cuartero y Garza (1859-1935). El objetivo de esta investigación es la puesta en valor del músico aragonés, reconstruyendo en la medida de lo posible los principales hechos profesionales y personales de su vida, atendiendo especialmente a su etapa oscense, que duraría más de 25 años, y que dejaría una huella importante en el ámbito musical gracias a su labor como organista en la catedral de Huesca, y también como músico en los cafés y sociedades de ocio de la ciudad. Las aportaciones artísticas de Cuartero constituyen una tesela más en el interesante conjunto que ofrece Huesca desde el punto de vista musical en el último cuarto del siglo XIX.\n\nIn this article we outline the artistic and teaching career of one of the protagonists of the musical landscape of Aragon in the last quarter of the 19th century: Alejo Cuartero y Garza (1859-1935). The aim of this research is to highlight the importance of this musician reconstructing, to the extent possible, the main professional and personal facts of his life, specially focusing on his period in Huesca, which would last for more than 25 years, and would leave an important mark on the musical scene, due to his work as an organist in the Cathedral of Huesca and also as a musician in the cafés and leisure societies of the city. Cuartero’s artistic contribution constitutes one of the tiles which make up the interesting ensemble displayed in Huesca from the musical point of view in the last quarter of the 19th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".