MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030309745

Morpho-anatomical and molecular reassessments of Rhodymenia prostrata (Rhodymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) from Japan support the recognition of Halopeltis tanakae nom. nov.

2021· article· en· W7030309745 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKobe University Repository Kernel (Kobe University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsResearch Organization of Information and SystemsJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceHokkaido UniversityKagoshima University
KeywordsGenusType localityTaxonomy (biology)Type speciesVegetation (pathology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We collected the deep-water species Rhodymenia prostrata (Rhodymeniaceae, Rhodophyta), for the first time in nearly 50 years, from the type locality off Mageshima Island, Japan. Our combined rbcL, cox1 and 28S rDNA analyses suggested that R. prostrata belongs in the genus Halopeltis but is distinct from all other Halopeltis species. However, the binomial Halopeltis prostrata already exists and hence a new epithet was required. Consequently, we propose the new name Halopeltis tanakae for R. prostrata based on morpho-anatomical and molecular analyses. The occurrence of small intercalating cells in H. tanakae is congruent with the generic concept of Halopeltis. Halopeltis tanakae is characterized by a procumbent thallus, crispate blades, cystocarps lacking basal constrictions, cystocarps primarily on blade margins, and mucilaginous strands in cystocarp cavities. Halopeltis tanakae is the second representative of the genus to be reported from the northwestern Pacific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKobe University Repository Kernel (Kobe University)Same topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207