“Nizâ-ı İlm ü Din” kitabının düşünce tarihi açısından tasvir ve tahlili
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GENEL BİLGİLER\nİsim ve Soyadı\t: Erkan YAVUZ\nAnabilim Dalı\t\t: Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri\nProgramı\t\t: İslam Felsefesi\nTez Danışmanı\t: Prof. Dr. İsmail KARA\nTez Türü ve Tarihi\t: Yüksek Lisans – Aralık 2010\nAnahtar Kelimeler\t: Nizâ, İlm, Din, Ahmed Midhat, Draper\n\n“NİZÂ-I İLM Ü DİN” KİTABININ DÜŞÜNCE TARİHİ AÇISINDAN TASVİR VE TAHLİLİ\nBu çalışma, Nizâ-ı İlm ü Din adlı eseri düşünce tarihi perspektifiyle incelemeyi hedeflemektedir. Nizâ-ı İlm ü Din, J. William Draper’in History of The Conflict Between Religion and Science adlı kitabının tercümesi ve mütercim Ahmed Midhat Efendi’nin bu kitaba yazdığı şerh ve tenkitleri içermektedir. Bu eser, Draper ve Midhat Efendi’nin gözüyle XIX. yüzyıl Batı düşüncesi ve Osmanlı düşüncesinin din-bilim ilişkisine bakışını yansıtmaktadır. Kitap, Osmanlı’da din-bilim ilişkisi tartışmalarını içeren ilk müstakil eserlerden biridir. \nTez; giriş, üç ana bölüm, ek ve sonuç kısımlarından oluşmaktadır. Giriş kısmında konunun çerçevesi belirlenmiş ve din-bilim ilişkisi tartışmalarının Batı’da ve Osmanlı’daki durumu hakkında bilgi verilmiştir. Birinci bölümde Ahmed Midhat Efendi ve Draper bu konudaki çalışmalarıyla tanıtılmıştır. Ayrıca eser şekil ve muhtevâ yönünden incelenmektedir. Kitap Hıristiyanlık ve İslâm dinlerinin bilimle ilişkisini içerdiği için ikinci bölüm Hıristiyanlık-bilim ilişkisine, üçüncü bölüm de İslâm-bilim ilişkisine ayrılmıştır. İkinci bölümde Draper ve Ahmed Midhat’ın Hıristiyanlık-bilim ilişkisine dair değerlendirmeleri yer almaktadır. Üçüncü bölüm, İslâm-bilim ilişkisine dair her iki yazarın değerlendirmelerinin yanında Osmanlı’da dönemin İslâm-bilim tartışmalarını da içermektedir. Böylece eserin bu tartışmalar içerisinde durduğu yer görülmektedir. Ayrıca üçüncü bölüme ek olarak eserde yer alan Midhat Efendi’ye ait “Ulûm ve İslâm” başlıklı ek bölüme de yer verilmiştir. \nGENERAL KNOWLEDGE\nName and Surname\t\t: Erkan Yavuz\nField\t\t\t\t: Philosophy and Religious Studies\nProgramme\t\t\t: Islamic Philosophy\nSupervisor\t\t\t: Professor İsmail KARA\nDegree Awarded and Date\t: Master – December 2010\nKeywords\t\t\t: Conflict, science, religion, Ahmed Midhat, Draper\nABSTRACT\nA DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF THE WORK “NİZÂ-I İLM Ü DİN” FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE HISTORY OF THOUGHT\nThis study aims to examine the work Nizâ-ı İlm ü Din with the perspective of intellectual history. Nizâ-ı İlm ü Din contains the translation of History of The Conflict Between Religion and Science by J. William Draper and the commentaries and criticism of the translator, Ahmed Midhat Efendi. This work reflects the XIXth century view of Western and Ottoman’s thoughts about religion-science relationship through the eyes of Draper and Midhat Efendi. The book which is the first self-contained works of the Ottoman Empire contains the debates on the relationship between religion and science.\nThe thesis has consisted of three main sections, additional parts and result. In the introduction, framework of the topic has been defined and the debates on science-religion relationship both in the west and in the Ottoman have been mentioned. In the first section Ahmed Midhat and Draper have been introduced with the studies on this issue. In addition, the work has been examined in terms of form and content. As the book contains the relationship between science and Christianity and Islam, second section has been divided into the relationship between science and Christianity. The third section, the relationship between Islam and science. In the second chapter the evaluations of Draper and Ahmet Midhat on relationship between Christianity and science has taken place. The third chapter has been included both assessments and debates of two authors on relationship between science and Islam in the Ottoman Empire.-era. Thus, it can be seen where the work stands among these discussions. Also in the work, in addition to the third section, "Ulum and Islam" by Midhat Efendi, is included in the entitled addition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".