MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7030340405

Measuring ice loading on podded propeller systems

2003· article· en· W7030340405 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropellerPropulsionMarine propulsionPropulsorMeasure (data warehouse)ArcticWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, work is on going to update all of the regulations governing the design of vessels for arctic navigation including the propulsion systems by the International Association of Classification Societies. However, there is a lack of information as to the loads occurring on the podded propeller systems operating in ice. Hence, this study aims to close the knowledge gap for this type of propulsion systems. This paper describes the experimental setup designed and built at National Research Council of Canada Institute for Marine dynamics (NRC-IMD), for measuring the ice loads on a podded propeller system. The experimental system is designed to measure the loads on three levels:1- loads on an individual blade (six components), 2- loads on the propeller shaft (thrust and torque) and, the fore and aft bearings which support the propeller shaft (six components), 3- global forces and moments on the (propeller + pod + strut) system (six components).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→