MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030372342

A Multivariate Survival Model for Studying Time to Emergence of Different Species of Weed

2021· report· en· W7030372342 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsDependency (UML)CovarianceGraphical modelMultivariate analysisPiecewiseWeedJoint probability distributionProportional hazards model
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the analysis of the time to emergence of different weeds using a multivariate frailty piecewise constant Cox proportional model analysing the time to emergence of different species of weed. In the multivariate model, we assume a joint Gaussian distribution on the frailty terms with expectation zero.We show how one can analyse the latent covariance structure of the frailty terms by inferring an undirected graphical model based on predicted values of the frailties. We study how the dependence structure of the frailties influences the dependency structure between the emergence times of the several species. Moreover, we show how we can estimate conditional expectations of the time to emergence given that the emergence is observed during the experiment period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceFrench-language works237,207