National men's health policy 2008-2013: working with men in Ireland to achieve optimum health & wellbeing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adopting a gender-mainstreaming approachThis policy adopts a gendered approach to men's health and recognises gender in the context of culturally defined masculine or feminine traits that are deemed to be socially appropriate to the sexes. [43] A 'gender-mainstreaming' [33] approach recognises that gender equality is best achieved through the integration of the health concerns of men and women in the development, implementation and evaluation of policies, both within and beyond health.Building on the Equal Status Acts 2000 to 2004, this policy endorses the approach taken by Health Canada's Gender-based Analysis Policy [34] and the Equal Opportunities Commission's Gender Equality Duty Code of Practice [35] in England and Wales, and adapts these policies as potential frameworks from which to develop a gender-mainstreaming approach to men's health in Ireland, across all Government departments, in the future. Adopting a social determinants approachThis policy adopts a social determinants [48] approach to defining men's health.It recognises that social and economic factors, including poverty, are key determinants of the health status of men. [7] The policy aligns itself with existing strategies [49,50] that target the reduction of poverty in Ireland and that seek to tackle health inequalities by working in partnership with National Anti-Poverty Networks and the Community Development Programme.By recognising diversity within men, this policy acknowledges the right of all men in Ireland to the best possible health, irrespective of social, cultural, political or ethnic differences. Adopting a community development approachIn recognition of the fact that one's community, defined by geography, culture or social stratification, is a valuable resource for health, this policy seeks to harness social capital among communities of men through a community development approach.By adopting this approach to men's health and positioning this policy within the wider social inclusion policy of Government [49,50] , all communities of men in Ireland may be supported to achieve optimum health and well-being. Adopting a health promotion, preventative approachIn the context of supporting health behaviour change and reducing premature mortality among men in Ireland, this policy calls for a gendered approach to the implementation and evaluation of health promotion policy in Ireland. [57]It centres on three core areas -settings (e.g.workplace), populations (e.g.young men) and topics (e.g.smoking cessation) -whereby lifestyle modification is targeted via key settings and topics through a life stage approach. [304] Adopting an intersectoral and interdepartmental approach Under the aegis of the Advisory Health Forum, this policy seeks to promote men's health in synergy with other policies and services within and beyond the health sector.Such an approach calls for the strengthening of alliances and partnerships with the community and voluntary sectors, as well as with the statutory sector in areas such as education, employment, environment and social affairs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".