MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030462988

A model-based road sign recognition system /

2002· dissertation· en· W7030462988 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2002
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutomated Road and Building Extraction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsTemplate matchingProcess (computing)ExploitModular designPattern recognition (psychology)Traffic sign recognitionAffine transformationSign (mathematics)Tree (set theory)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A road sign recognition system poses a real challenge for machine vision. It must recognize a wide variety of road signs under considerable variations in illumination and imaging geometry---all in real-time. This thesis presents a modular road sign recognition system relying on modelling for both detection and recognition. It divides into three main stages of processing. The first, concerned with detection, exploits the specific colors of road signs. The color constancy problem caused by the daylight illumination variations is addressed directly with a physics-based model supplemented by a calibration stage using real data. The second stage of processing, devoted to recognizing road signs in regions of interest found in the detection phase, involves a database containing more than 400 road signs arranged in a tree structure, and uses a novel correlation-based template matching technique relying on a bitwise encoding that accounts for both color labels and affine variations in the image formation process, and which also allows to build templates that are able to represent classes of objects. The content of the database used by the recognition algorithm is generated in a deterministic and automated manner by way of geometrical modelling of the image formation process starting with only model images of the road signs to be recognized. The recognition algorithm exploits color as a first logical classification step to direct the search for a road sign in the database, with the later finer steps being driven by correlation scores obtained from template matching. At the third stage of processing, a scene understanding module exploits constraints on the position of road signs along with the spatial relationships they must have in certain cases to other road signs in the image to filter out false positives. During processing, the system incorporates top-down mechanisms that use data fed back by partial recognitions, which allow to progressively gain more information about

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicAutomated Road and Building ExtractionFrench-language works237,207