Newman’s theology of faith : a guiding light in a secular age
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the onset, one must state that this article seeks to be of help in an anthropologically endangered landscape and to suggest ways in which the present age’s characteristic forgetfulness of God might be wisely addressed for the benefit of humanity. John Henry Newman’s theology of faith is thus engaged with this specific motive well-kept in view. Throughout the second half of the twentieth century and during the years following the dawn of the new millennium, the phenomenon of secularisation has been one among the most debated. Starting with a simple and direct definition of the “promiscuous concept”1 represented by the term “secularisation,” Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor affirmed that the concept traditionally conveyed “two different meanings: a) the decline of religious belief and practice; b) the retreat of religion from the public space.” Furthermore, Sommerville contended that the term “‘[s]ecularism’ should be differentiated from the more general theme of secularization. The term secularism was coined around 1852 to describe an ideology organized to counter religious loyalties.” [excerpt]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it