Ni’metullah Nahçıvani’nin Hidayetü’l-ihvan’ı (metin tercüme ve inceleme)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nİ’METULLAH NAHÇIVÂNÎ’NİN HİDÂYETÜ’L-İHVÂN’I\n\tTezimizin amacı Ni’metullah Nahçıvânî’nin hayâtını incelemek ve Hidâyetü’l-İhvân adlı eseri ışığında tasavvufî görüşlerini tesbit etmektir.\n\tXV. yüzyılın ikinci yarısı ve XVI. yüzyılın ikinci çeyreğinde yaşayan Ni’metullah Nahçıvânî tasavvufî tefsîriyle bilinen bir Nakşibendî şeyhidir. Muhyiddîn İbnü’l-Arabî’yle olgunlaşmış irfân çizgisinde eserler kaleme almış olan Nahçıvânî’nin tasavvuf tarihindeki önemi tasavvufî/işârî tefsirler içerisinde Kur’ân’ın bütün âyetlerinin tasavvufî usûle göre yorumlandığı ilk tefsire sâhip olmasıdır. \n \tNahçıvânî Hidâyetü’l-İhvân adlı Arapça eserinde ekberî dönem sûfîlerin varlık anlayışını merkeze alarak birçok tasavvufî kavram ve konuyu lemiş, filozof ve kelâmcıların başta varlık konusu olmakla görüşlerini tenkit etmiştir. Tasavvufî tenkit türüne örnek sayılabilecek olan Hidâyetü’l-İhvân övgü ve yerginin üst düzeyde kullanıldığı cezbe ve coşkuya dayalı dil ve sec’ili bir üslupla yazılmıştır. Tezimizin birinci bölümünde Nahçıvânî’nin mezkûr eserdeki tasavvufî konulara bakış açısı incelenmiş, ikinci bölümünde eserin tercümesi ve üçüncü bölümünde ise neşri yapılmıştır.\nAnahtar Kavramlar: Ni’metullah Nahçıvânî, tasavvuf, Hidâyetü’l-İhvan.\nABSTRACT\nNİ’METULLAH NAHÇIVÂNÎ’S HİDÂYETÜ’L-İHVÂN\n\tThe purpose of my thesis is to analyze the life of Ni’metullah Nahçıvânî and to determine his opinions in the light of his work of art Hidâyetü’l-İhvân.\n\tNi’metullah Nahçıvânî who had lived in the second half of XV and in the first quarter of XVI century was a Shaykh of Naqshbandi Sufi order. As a follower of Muhyi al-Din Ibn al-Arabi’s gnostic teachings, Nahçıvânî was an important figure in the history of Islamic Mysticism being the first interpreter within Sufi understandings (Tafsirs) of the entire Qur’an.\n\tNahçıvânî in his Hidâyetü’l-İhvân while concentrating on the Idea of Being during the period of the Akbarian tradition summarized many Sufi concepts and themes, and criticized philosophers’ and theologians’ (mutakallimῑn) views. Hidâyetü’l-İhvân was written in an assonant style in a criticizing and reprehending language. The first part of my thesis examines Nahçıvânî’s views on Islamic Mysticism (Tasawwuf) mentioned in his work; the second part includes translation of Hidâyetü’l-İhvân; and the third part comprises the publication of the original work in Arabic.\nKey words: Ni’metullah Nahçıvânî, Islamic Mysticism, Hidâyetü’l-İhvan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.063 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".