MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030577170

Note de lecture de l'ouvrage sous la direction de Sébastien Lord et Denise Piché (2018). Vieillissement et aménagement : perspectives plurielles. Montréal : Presses de l'Université de Montréal

2018· other· fr· W7030577170 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueConstellation (Université du Québec à Chicoutimi) · 2018
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)White (mutation)Relation (database)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

l'Université de Montréal publiaient un ouvrage sur te vieillissement et l'aménagement.Sous la direction de Sébastien Lord et de Denise Piché, respectivement professeur agrégé à !'École d'urbanisme et d'architecture de l'Université de Montréal et professeure associée à !'École d'architecture de l'Université Laval, cet ouvrage s'intéresse au droit de se loger convenablement pour tes personnes aînées du troisième et quatrième âge au Québec et dans tes pays de ta francophonie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0070.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueConstellation (Université du Québec à Chicoutimi)Same topicDisaster Management and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207