MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030709910

Boys in the Trees

2016· other· en· W7030709910 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHallucinatingHollywoodMovie theaterProscriptionFeelingCategorizationMeaning (existential)Best practice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Class horror score tropes (Carpenter), sweet dystopian darkness (Badliamenti), contemporary soundtrack experimentation (Levi) and electronic audiovisual juxtapositions ("The Knick", "Stranger Things"), underpin contemporary approaches to soundtracks in this genre. For a film which relishes a genre fluidity, the researcher was tasked with the problem of simultaneously working with extant audiovisual and audionarrative conventions, as well as finding more experimental approaches - methodological and aesthetic - that responded to the experimental mode of the film. CONTRIBUTION Whilst the score embraced tender emotional proscription and visceral sonic violence, it eschewed anchoring images into meaning (Gorbman, 1987) in favour of an ambient residue of "the meaningful". Developing moods untied to scenes which were then fed into the visual edit, injected a level of noise into the collaborative process which short-circuited what is usually a more musically reactive process. This experimentation lead to a discovery of new audiovisual relationships - an innovation which underpins the score. SIGNIFICANCE. The ubiquity of the Hollywood approach to film score (WIlliams, Zimmer) has tended to minimise the soundtrack's potential to enrich and make more emotionally and conceptually sophisticated the audiovisual experience. Whilst, at points, this score abides by established tropes, it also eschewed emotional proscription in favour of a feeling of meaningful strangeness. Esteem indicators: Mushroom pictures. SA film & Screen Australia funding. Official film festival selection Toronto, Austin, Stockholm. Awards: Best Feature, Austin, Best Screenplay (Unproduced),NewFest 2011. Nominations: Best Music, FCCA; Best Original Score, AACTA, Best Feature, Nicholas Verso, AWGIE, Best Film 73rd Venice Film Festival https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/boys-in-trees-original-score/id1159214523 https://play.spotify.com/album/42QDJrFMDDkMqCLcf1eMAQ http://boysinthetrees.com.au/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it