MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7030725788

Niagara documents collection, 1846-1957, n.d.

2022· other· en· W7030725788 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)InvoiceTowerPaymentLeaseEasementSalaryCertificate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The collection consists of correspondence, programs, financial documents, and brochures. Some of the material concerns Niagara. Niagara documents include an invoice from L.C. Woodruff, Paper Manufacturer and Dealer, for stationary, dated at Buffalo, July 8, 1867; an acknowledgement of payment of salary to the Town of Clifton from constable Bennet Hull, April 1, 1872; an invoice from the Town of Clifton to B.C. Lundy, January 9, 1872; a petition to the mayor of Clifton from local butchers requesting a refrigerator in the market-house, June 3, 1872; an invoice to G.W. Taylor, Mayor of Clifton, from the Queen’s Printer, Ottawa, 1872; invoices from the municipal electric light and power plant to the Steel Arch Bridge, 1912; invoices from the provincial natural gas & fuel company to the Niagara Ry. Bridge, 1912-1913; a letter to George Hulme, Thorold, from the Department of Railways and Canals, Welland Ship Canal, concerning a lease of land, July 20, 1933; a letter by the special deputy collector of customs in Niagara Falls, N.Y. introducing ex-sheriff George Lamey, July 20, 1912; a program of worship for Morrison Street United Church in Niagara Falls, Ontario, November 3, 1957; and brochures for the Skylon Tower and Seagram Tower in Niagara Falls, n.d.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3280.246

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)→French-language works237,207→