Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research background: There has been a significant rise in group-based and collective art practice that challenges conventional methodologies and ideas of individual authorship in art. These enterprises approach art as an expanded form of intellectual activity by capitalizing on group dynamics and collective research. Research contribution: The Weak Force 2 builds upon previous iterations of Weak Force projects by the UFT collaborative group. The artists produced a sonic installation as part of the Guilford International Music Festival. This installation sculpturally and conceptually revisited Luigi Rusollo's 'sound intoners' or 'intonarumori' on the 100th year anniversary of his groundbreaking manifesto 'The Art of Noises'. The Weak Force 3 explored Russolo's basic premise of a systematic poetics of noise through sounds recorded in Canada, Australia, Auckland and Wellington in New Zealand. Vibrational speakers and buckets were used to reconfigure these sounds from the general field into a textual composition within the Lewis Elton Gallery. Research significance: The significance of this research is that group-based practice was used to extend and combine the practices of eight artists working across four different continents. The resulting exhibition explored ideas of disjunction and synchronicity by presenting abstracted sound recordings from across the globe within an installation context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it