MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7031220773

The FLQ Manifesto

2006· article· en· W7031220773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManifestoReferendumPoliticsMemoirGovernment (linguistics)Sovereignty
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1963 the Quebec Liberation Front (FLQ) was formed as a violent revolutionary movement made up of volunteers to fight for the liberation of Quebec. In 1970 the FLQ kidnapped British diplomat James Cross and Quebec politician Pierre Laporte in order to gain the release of all FLQ political prisoners in Quebec, and to push for Quebec's independence. The FLQ did not obtain the release of any political prisoners, but their manifesto of grievances against the Canadian government was read on national television. This paper established that the manifesto advanced popular support for sovereignty for Quebec among French Canadians, and eventually lead to the referendum for independence in 1980. This paper used Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, Quebec and New York newspapers, political memoirs and autobiographies, parliamentary debates, biographies, and other secondary sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.146
Teacher spread0.134 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207