Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetics: Human Aspects, 2d ed., by Arthur P. Mange and Elaine Johansen Mange. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, 1989. 591 pp. $38.95. (Reviewed by Gabriel W. Lasker, Wayne State University) Human Biology and Behavior, 5th ed., by Mark L. Weiss and Alan E. Mann. Glenview, 111.: Scott Foresman/Little, Brown, 1990. 624 pp. $33.95 (cloth). (Reviewed by Kenneth A.R. Kennedy, Cornell University) The Anatomy and Biology of the Human Skeleton, by Gentry Steele and Claud A. Bramblett. College Station, Tx.: Texas A&M University Press, 1988. 291 pp. $55.00. (Reviewed by M. Anne Katzenberg, University of Calgary) Evolutionary Jurisprudence: Prospects and Limitations on the Use of Modern Darwinism throughout the Legal Process, by John H. Beckstrom. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1989. 168 pp. $24.95. (Reviewed by Eugenie C. Scott, National Center for Science Education) Physical Anthropology, 4th ed., by Philip L. Stein and Bruce M. Rowe. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1989. 512 pp., glossary. $32.95 (softcover). (Reviewed by Martin K. Nickels, Illinois State University)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.424 | 0.391 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".