Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Imagery of John Donne's Sermons (Winfried Schleiner) (Reviewed by Michael McCanles, Marquette University)Art and Pornography (Morse Peckham) (Reviewed by Jan B. Gordon, State University of New York at Buffalo)Coleridge and the Pantheist Tradition (Thomas McFarland) (Reviewed by J. Robert Barth, S.J., Harvard University)Thomas Hardy: Distance and Desire (J. Hillis Miller) (Reviewed by Bert G. Hornback, University of Michigan)The Barb of Time: On the Unity of Ezra Pound's Cantos (Daniel D. Pearlman) (Reviewed by A. K. Weatherhead, University of Oregon)Ezra Pound: The Image and the Real (Herbert N. Schneidau) (Reviewed by A. K. Weatherhead, University of Oregon)Form and Frenzy in Swift's Tale of a Tub (John R. Clark) (Reviewed by Peter Thorpe, University of Colorado, Denver)The Birth of Modern Comedy in Renaissance Italy (Douglas Radcliff-Umstead) (Reviewed by James E. Robinson, University of Notre Dame)D. H. Lawrence and the New World (David Cavitch) (Reviewed by George J. Zytaruk, Nipissing College, Ontario, Canada)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.387 | 0.374 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".