Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report contains the results of work completed during the sixth year of the Full \nWaveform Acoustic Logging Consortium in the Earth Resources Laboratory at M.LT. \nOver the last six years, our work have evolved from simply modelling an open borehole \nin an isotropy, elastic formation to the study of logging under more complicated, realistic conditions, especially those that may be encounted in production and development environments. \nIn the past year, we have modelled elastic wave propagation in a transversely \nisotropic formation, in a formation where the borehole is irregular in radius, across an \nopen fracture, and in a transversely isotropic porous formation, where the horizontal \nand vertical permeabilities are different. All of these situations are rather common in \nthe field. It is important for us to understand how these complications mayor may \nnot affected our interpretation of the full waveform acoustic logs, and how large an \nerror we are likely to make if our interpretation is based on a isotropy, elastic model \nof the formation. Just as importantly, we need to learn to identify these situations in \nthe field, so that we can make the appropriate corrections to our interpretation. \nIn data analysis, we have refined the Extended Prony's Method to calculate the \ndispersion and attenuation of the guided waves in the borehole, and have applied \nthe technique to both laboratory and field data with success. We have also studied \nthe sensistivity of the guided waves to a transversely anisotropic formation. These \nsensistivities are critical in the inversion of the dispersion and attenuation obtained \nby the Extended Prony's Method for the actual elastic and anelastic properties of the \nformation. \nIn a continuation of last year's work, we have studied the attenuation of solid particles \nin a viscous fluid, applicable to the study of both drilling muds and unconsolidated \nsands. \nWe have studied the diffraction of a cylindrical transducer and its effect on the \nmeasurement of attenuation in laboratory experiments using the spectral ratio technique. \nWe are also continuing in our effort of scale model experiments to mimic field \nsituations which are not readily modelled by analytic or numerical methods. \nA field study and comparison of velocities from core measurement, borehole compensated \nsonic log, full waveform acoustic log, and VSP in the Salton Sea Scientific \nDrilling Program is included in this report. Also included is an extended abstract on an \neffort to map fractures in the Canadian Shield using borehole geophysical techniques. \nThe following is a summary of the papers in this report.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".