MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7031692253

B.F. Berry 204981

2013· other· en· W7031692253 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemolitionPort (circuit theory)ColonialismGeorge (robot)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The “B.F. Berry” was built in 1908 by the American Ship Building Co., of Lorain, Ohio. The steel propeller vessel experienced numerous ownership and name changes. From 1908 until 1915, she was owned by the Fremont Steamship Co. (Herbert K. Oakes, Mgr.), of Detroit, Michigan. In 1915, ownership transferred to Franklin Steamship Co. (Herbert K. Oakes, Mgr.), of Cleveland, OH. They owned her until 1922, when she was sold to Matthews Steamship Co., Ltd., of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. While under their ownership, she was renamed “Berryton” and registered as Canadian vessel number 141676. Frederick C. Clarkson (Receiver) (Toronto Elevators, Ltd., Mgr.), also of Toronto, purchased the vessel in 1932 and owned her for one year. In 1933, Colonial Steamship, Ltd. (R. Scott Misener, Mgr.) of Port Colborne, Ont. owned the vessel. She was renamed ”Viscount Bennett” in 1942, and as “C.A. Bennett” in 1954. She was sold again in 1959 to Scott Misner Steamships, Ltd., St. Catharines, Ont.; they maintained ownership until 1968. The vessel was sold again in 1968 to Marine Salvage, Ltd., of Port Colborne, Ont., and again to Desguaces y Recuperaciones del Sur “Emiliano Alonse Castrillo” for scrapping in Spain. She arrived in Spain on August 29, 1969, and demolition began upon arrival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)Same topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207