Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[eng] The I coupDefouet International Congress was held in June 2013 to celebrate the tenth anniversary of coupDefouet, the magazine of the Art Nouveau European Route, an association of municipalities and other entities to promote and disseminate Modernista or Art Nouveau heritage. Its success and excellent scientific results led to its continuity with a second congress, held in 2015, whose acts are presented in this volume of Singularities. The congresses are organised by the Urban Landscape Institute (IMPUiQV) of the Barcelona City Council in partnership with GRACMON, a consolidated research group of the University of Barcelona. [cat] El primer Congrés Internacional coupDefouet se celebrà el juny de l’any 2013 per commemorar els deu anys de l’aparició de coupDefouet, la revista de la Ruta Europea del Modernisme, una associació de municipis i altres entitats per a la promoció i la difusió del patrimoni modernista o Art Nouveau. Gràcies a l’èxit i als bons resultats científics es va apostar per la seva continuïtat amb un segon congrés que tingué lloc el 2015, les actes del qual presentem en aquest volum de Singularitats. Aquestes jornades estan organitzades per l’Institut Municipal del Paisatge Urbà i la Qualitat de Vida de l’Ajuntament de Barcelona, amb la col·laboració de GRACMON, grup de recerca consolidat de la Universitat de Barcelona.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it