Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sixty-six papers and more than ninety bios and abstracts are included in this publication of the Proceedings of TSA's 10th Biennial Symposium in Toronto. The Proceedings reflect in text and image the substance and the intellectual vibrancy that characterized the Textile Society of America's 10th Biennial Symposium in Toronto. The contents are published substantively as submitted. Our editorial efforts comprised formatting of more than 500 images and preparing each paper to a standard visual style of presentation. We have endeavored to bring all papers into a consistent visual format, suitable for either screenviewing or hard-copy print-out. Since the symposium was held in Canada, British spellings and French contributions were retained as submitted. The papers are organized according to the sequence of the Program, which serves effectively as a Table of Contents with internal hypertext links to authors' names and papers. Abstracts and bios are arranged alphabetically, linked by names and paper titles to the Program. The hybrid HTML format of this CD-ROM is the inspired product of Omnipress, where our colleagues have effected the virtual interlacing of authors' names, bios, abstracts, and papers with internal hypertext links. An alphabetical authors' list provides additional means of access to the papers, and the CD is fully searchable by subject or keyword. Individual papers may be printed or e-mailed as PDF files. Authors retain copyright for their individual contributions; authors were advised of their responsibility to secure permissions for their reproduction of photographs. We hope that the hybrid HTML format of the CD-ROM provides flexibility and easy navigation. We welcome your thoughts on revisions for future symposia proceedings. An Evaluation Form is provided for your use; we look forward to hearing from you.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.057 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.718 | 0.581 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".