Bibliographic record
Abstract
The history of Innsbruck’s area studies centres is a story of success. It began 15 years ago in April 1997 when the first of five area studies centres at the University of Innsbruck – the Canadian Studies Centre – was established. Innsbruck thus played a leading role in Austria as the CSC was not only the first centre for Canadian Studies but also one of the very first centres for area studies to be inaugurated at an Austrian university. In this work report, which continues the record of 1997-2007 published in volume VIII of the canadiana oenipontana series, the Canadian Studies Centre takes stock of the years 2008 to 2012. - Die Geschichte der Länderzentren der Universität Innsbruck ist eine Erfolgsgeschichte. Sie begann vor 15 Jahren, als im April 1997 das erste der fünf Innsbrucker Länderzentren – das Zentrum für Kanadastudien – aus der Taufe gehoben wurde. Innsbruck übernahm damit eine Vorreiterrolle, denn das ZKS Innsbruck war österreichweit nicht nur das erste Kanadazentrum, sondern auch eines der ersten Länderzentren überhaupt, die an einer Österreichischen Universität installiert wurden. Im vorliegenden Arbeitsbericht, der an Band VIII der Reihe canadiana oenipontana anschließt, zieht das Zentrum für Kanadastudien über die letzten fünf Jahre (2008-2012) Bilanz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.945 | 0.945 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".