MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7031870840

Repérages

2022· other· fr· W7031870840 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2022
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovations in Educational Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProjection (relational algebra)ChineJoint (building)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vu sur la newsletter Géoconfluences, l'article Le concept de troisième pôle : cartes et représentations polaires de la Chine d'Olga V. Alexeeva, sinologue, professeure d'histoire de la Chine - Université du Québec à Montréal (UQÀM) et Frédéric Lasserre, professeur de géographie, directeur du Conseil québécois d’Études géopolitiques (CQEG) - Université Laval, Québec. L'article explique notamment comment le choix de la projection cartographique sert d'outil politique de la Chine, dans le cad...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.008
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7710.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicInnovations in Educational MethodsFrench-language works237,207