Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
THE LoWER SILURIAN SYSTEM is represented, in the southeastern part of the State of Indiana, by rocky strata, about 750 feet in thick ness, belonging to what is known to geologists as the Hudson River Group.These rocks have been studied a great deal,_ especially in the vicinity of Richmond, Weisburg, Versailles, and Madison, and have furnished many new species of fossils that have been described in the palreontological reports of New York, Ohio and Illinois, and in the Cincinnati Quarterly Journal of Science and Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History.I am able now to add a few new species from the same localities, and some from rocks of about the same age, in Tennessee, which constitute what is called the Nashville Group.The Hudson River Group of Indiana is followed, as it appears to me, by rocks of the age of the Niagara Group.At least, I have been un able to discover any evidence of the existence of the Medina and Clin ton Groups, which intervene, between the Hudson River and Niagara, in New York and Canada.The lower part of the Niagara Group, in Indiana, is characterized by the presence of the remains of cystideans; while the upper part abounds with crinoids, brachiopods, bryozoa and ORDER RUGOSA. FAMILY CY ATHOPHYLLIDlE.AMPLEXUS BLAIR:r, 1\.SP
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it