Bibliographic record
Abstract
This project proposes the renovation and addition of a silo of a building located in Brockton, Ontario. There are 4 floors proposed to be added in the silo, each floor will have an area of approximately 118 sqm including the addition. The first floor is an art gallery for display and selling artworks created by local artists, and a small storage room. Second and third floor are areas for activity, where there are different rooms for different activities including cooking, woodworking, arts, and more. The fourth floor is a gathering space and the building's main storage room at the side. The addition is a staircase with an area of 9 sqm, it has access to all floors of the building and has an exit, it is located at the north of the building. Exterior aesthetics of the building were kept original while changes were made to the wall design to adapt passive heating. Both the main building and the addition uses the wood framing system for floors , walls, and roofs. Interior floor finish to be wood flooring, and typical white paint on gypsum wall board for the interior wall finish. This building will be in use to accommodate both local visitors and tourists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.210 | 0.093 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".