MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7032775050

The occurrence of the North Pacific diatom Neodenticula seminae in the North Atlantic during the Pleistocene with a correlation to planktonic foraminifera at ODP Site 983.

2010· dissertation· en· W7032775050 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePEARL (University of Plymouth) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera: Cerambycidae studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForaminiferaPlanktonPleistoceneDiatomArcticArchipelagoLatitude
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The middle to high latitude North Pacific diatom Neodenticula seminae appeared in the North\nAtlantic between the ages of ~1.2 and -0.8 Ma. It has recently been rediscovered in the North\nAtlantic during Continuous Plankton Recorder surveys (CPR) in the Labrador Sea which\nsuggests that the same climatic conditions that were present in the early to mid-Pleistocene\nare now re-occurring during modem times allov^ng North Pacific currents to make their way\nthrough the Canadian Archipelago and/or Fram Strait, through Arctic waters and mto the\nNorth Atlantic. Forty four sediment samples were processed and analysed from ODP Site\n983, Hole 983A for planktonic foraminifera abundances and then compared against the FO\nand LO of Neodenticula seminae within the early to mid-Pleistocne (-1.2 to -0.8 Ma). The\nmost significant taxa: Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (mean 48.71%), Neogloboquadrina\nincompta (mean 22.86%), and Turborotalita quinqueloba (mean 8.59%) revealed a tripartite\nresponse to changes in sea temperatures with N. pachydrma showing an inverse relationship\nto N. incompta. These findings were then correlated against an age model and three main\nintervals within the stratigraphic imit based on the FO and LO of Neodenticula seminae.\nThe interval shown in-between the FO and LO of N. seminae does seem to show a pulse of\ncolder water that entered the North Atlantic between -1.2 and -0.8 Ma as shown by the high\nabundances of N. pachyderma, but due to the high amount of barren samples aroimd the\nboimdaries, there is no way of separating any cold pulse of Arctic water, caused by glacial\nmelting, from the background glacial/interglacial signal shown by the age model. It is\ntherefore recommended that further investigations should be applied to constraining the\ndefmite age of N. seminae and repeating studies using a smaller size fraction (<125 |xm)\nand/or benthic foraminifera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEARL (University of Plymouth)Same topicColeoptera: Cerambycidae studiesFrench-language works237,207