Orsha Gostel of 13th century: to the issue of Rostov localization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our work aims to research the Ukrainian Cyrillic Orshan Gospel of the 13th century according to the original. (V.I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine, Institute of Manuscript, f. 301, No. 555 P). Conduct historiographic, archeographic and paleographic research on the localization of the book, in connection with the latest Russian version of the manuscript of the Rostov origin, based on the attribution to the Spassky Gospel of the 13th century. (Yaroslavl State Museum-Reserve, No. 15690). Methodology. The research uses historiographical, paleographical and source-based methods of analysis, which will contribute to the solution of the stated problem. Scientific novelty. The paleographic attribution of the writing was carried out in relation to the non/Rostov localization of the manuscript. The Rostov origin of the book is denied. It has been established that the manuscript is written in the Church Slavonic language of the ancient Ukrainian edition, and it is likely that it originated from the Kyiv princely scriptorium. Conclusions. The Orsha Gospel is aprakos complete, written in the last quarter of the 13th century, charter letter on parchment, probably in Kyiv. The conducted research confirms the manuscript belonging to the Kyiv writing school; its protograph was a chronologically much earlier codex (up to the middle of the 12th century) of the Kyiv origin. The Orsha Gospel is a written monument of the Church Slavonic language of the Old Ukrainian (=Old Rus) Kyiv edition. There are no obvious paleographical and orthographical signs to localize the monument to the Rostov script. This is evidenced by the annotated analysis of the Orsha Gospel regarding its belonging to the Rostov codices, directly to the Spassky Gospel of the 13th century. Further study of the book will provide more localizing arguments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it