MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7032935626

Optimal Levels of Embeddedness

2011· dissertation· en· W7032935626 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenArchive@CBS (Copenhagen Business School) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Technology, and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRotman School of Management, University of TorontoUniversity of TorontoLunds UniversitetCopenhagen Business School
KeywordsEmbeddednessArgument (complex analysis)Transaction costDatabase transactionLead (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Co-location of industry professionals often leads to development of\ncollaboration networks, and multiple studies have emphasized the benefits of\nembedded collaboration. Due to higher levels of trust, embedded collaboration\nreduces transaction costs and facilitates ready knowledge exchanged. Other\nstudies have pointed to dangers of over-embeddedness. The argument is that\ntoo high levels of embeddedness lead to habitual thinking, preferential\ntreatment, and thereby mitigate performance. However, research on the\nconditions under which embeddedness in different types of collaboration\nnetworks primarily yields costs or benefits still leaves much to be investigated....

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0990.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenArchive@CBS (Copenhagen Business School)Same topicArt, Technology, and CultureFrench-language works237,207