MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7032943977

Porters, Guides and Hunters: work and resistance in the Portuguese expedition to the interior of Africa (1884–1885)

2016· article· en· W7032943977 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortugueseWork (physics)Resistance (ecology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Social history (medicine)Gold coast
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The work has as main objective to discuss the essential presence of the Africans and Luso-africans’ work in the scientific expeditions in the hinterlands of the African Continent, mainly after the publication of a legislature concerning the management of the “indígena” work on the part of the Portuguese after 1850, and mainly through the expedition of Hermenegildo Capelo e Roberto Ivens from Angola to Mozambique between 1884 – 1885. Through Social History of the Work and Social History of the Sciences we aim to give attention to the experiences and to the daily life resistances of cooks, hunters and guides in the Coast to Coast Expedition undertaken by Portuguese in the last quarter of XIXth century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207